The Internet is unforgiving in its accurate record keeping of exactly what people wrote and when they wrote it.
It is highly instructive to revisit opinions of the people who told us that invading Iraq was in the best interests of the United States. Amazingly, some of these people such as neo-conservative Reuel Marc Gerecht still think we should listen to them.
Below are some samples and links to writing from Mr. Gerecht, Richard Perle and a host of other misguided individuals who all told us that this war thing would work out just fine.
The full page of links can be found here
Of special interest to me is the hypocrisy of David Frum who complains about the dictator Saddam whose brutality and murder were perfectly acceptable when those atrocities worked in our favor.
""Saddam has no title to rule his country. He seized power by force, and has held it by murder. He represents the will of nobody but himself. And yet there are people all over the world, and even freely elected heads of democratic governments, who see it as an important principle to preserve Saddam in power.""
From Richard Perle:
"Blix is dealing with Saddam as if he were a normal, sane person. But Saddam isn't someone you can treat like that. Blix doesn't have a clue that he's talking to a bloodthirsty thug as if he were in a Bloomsbury salon. In fact the whole approach of the weapons inspectors has been wrong. The impression is being created that they are trying hard to find weapons of mass destruction-and because they can't find them, maybe they do not exist."
From Reuel Marc Gerecht: it should be noted that despite Mr. Gerecht's predictions, Pakistani President Musharraf recently awarded amnesty to pro-Taliban tribal leaders.
""The Pakistani example is illuminating. In 2001, after the September 11 attacks, Secretary of State Colin Powell visited Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf, who had consistently backed the Taliban regime in Kandahar, the protector of al Qaeda. General Musharraf had also been one of the primary architects of the practice of using Afghanistan for training Islamic militants for the guerrilla-cum-terrorist war in India-controlled Kashmir. These training camps, supervised by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence Agency, were interconnected and co-located with some of the training programs funded and organized by al Qaeda. With Powell's visit, General Musharraf quickly understood America's resolve, abandoned the Taliban, fired some pro-Taliban army and ISI officers, and confronted Islamists within Pakistan whom he had once backed. Now it is open to doubt whether Islamabad has permanently retired from playing the fundamentalist card among the Pashtun tribes in Afghanistan, but Musharraf and his fellow military officers will certainly be wary of resuming past habits so long as they believe Washington is looking over their shoulder and retains the will and capacity to punish them painfully."
Thursday, December 21, 2006
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
VIOLENT JIHAD - A REAGAN LEGACY?
Believe it or not, it was Ronald W. Reagan who began the process of educating Afghan children in Wahhabism. That is the radical version of Islam that fuels the jihadists behind terror attacks worldwide.
This is yet another story not widely reported by the so-called liberal media. But in our efforts to help the Taliban defeat the Soviets at the end of the Cold War, virulently "anti infidel" textbooks were paid for by US tax dollars and shipped to Afghanistan.
As a nation, we should really start paying attention to these periodic reminders that if we would just mind our own business, and keep our noses out of the affairs of other nations, maybe the anti-terror strategy of our neighbor to the north, Canada, would be all we need to protect America as well.
Note that Canada has had no terror attacks since 09/11.
http://www.theglobalist.com/DBWeb/StoryId.aspx?StoryId=3453
Looking back, it seems unbelievable that the U.S. government would ever hatch such a scheme. But during the presidency of Ronald Reagan — when all vision was still focused on the Cold War — the United States got itself into the business of sponsoring militant Islamic schools for Afghanistan, then a nation under the influence of the Soviet Union. Martin Schram explains.
Believe it or not, it was Ronald W. Reagan who began the process of educating Afghan children in Wahhabism. That is the radical version of Islam that fuels the jihadists behind terror attacks worldwide.
This is yet another story not widely reported by the so-called liberal media. But in our efforts to help the Taliban defeat the Soviets at the end of the Cold War, virulently "anti infidel" textbooks were paid for by US tax dollars and shipped to Afghanistan.
As a nation, we should really start paying attention to these periodic reminders that if we would just mind our own business, and keep our noses out of the affairs of other nations, maybe the anti-terror strategy of our neighbor to the north, Canada, would be all we need to protect America as well.
Note that Canada has had no terror attacks since 09/11.
http://www.theglobalist.com/DBWeb/StoryId.aspx?StoryId=3453
Looking back, it seems unbelievable that the U.S. government would ever hatch such a scheme. But during the presidency of Ronald Reagan — when all vision was still focused on the Cold War — the United States got itself into the business of sponsoring militant Islamic schools for Afghanistan, then a nation under the influence of the Soviet Union. Martin Schram explains.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)